Thursday, 2 May 2013

What Does A Smile Mean? (Updated)

Jeff Bauman in the hospital after the Boston Marathon bombing

Jeff Bauman in the hospital after the Boston Marathon bombing

Jeff Bauman is in the picture to the right. He is in the news right now because he had the great misfortune of being near one of the Boston Marathon bombs.

In the picture Bauman is smiling and giving a thumb’s up. He is also missing both of his legs. Actor Bradley Cooper is to the left and New England Patriots wide receiver Julian Edelman (who tweeted the picture) is to the right.

As soon as he woke up in the hospital, he asked for pen and paper to write that he saw the bomber and then went on to help the FBI.

I bring this smile photo up today because, over the years, I’ve covered several rulings by courts that deal with defense attorneys asking to fish through the Facebook and other social media sites of plaintiffs. They ask to fish because the plaintiff is smiling in a photo and claim that the smile is inconsistent with suffering.

Here are two examples: In Davids v. Novartis,  drug-maker Novartis went fishing on the basis of a smile in a photograph and Magistrate Judge Williams D. Wall slapped it down, writing, “is not clear to the court, one picture of Plaintiff smiling does not contradict her claim of suffering, nor is it sufficient evidence to warrant a further search into Plaintiff’s account.”

By contrast, a Suffolk County judge permitted access to Facebook based on the same theory, writing in Romano v. Steelcase:

In this regard, it appears that plaintiff’s public profile page on Facebook shows her smiling happily in a photograph outside the confines of her home despite her claim that she has sustained permanent injuries and is largely confined to her house and bed. (see also, in contrast,  Eric Goldman’s commentary on the Romano photo)

Perhaps future courts will take note of the picture of Bauman, with a smile and a thumb’s up, to note that a smile in a snapshot does not magically mean everything is well.

As Bauman makes abundantly clear in this picture, people can smile for a multitude of reasons. It may be because they are happy to be alive. Or because someone said something humorous, even at a funeral. Or simply because of instinct when someone lifts a camera and hollers, “Say cheese.”

Judges and practitioners, please take note.

Heather Abbott, of Newport, R.I., is wheeled into a news conference past members of the media, behind, at Brigham and Women's Hospital, in Boston, Thursday, April 25, 2013. Abbott underwent a below the knee amputation during surgery on her left leg following injuries she sustained at the Boston Marathon bombings on April 15. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)Updated (4/26/13) – Another smile, this time from bombing Heather Abbott. One week after the bombing, she had her leg amputated. Prior attempts to surgically repair the leg had failed.

Three days after the amputation she appeared at a press conference. And smiled. You can see her expression here.

A smile may mean many things.

Share

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewYorkPersonalInjuryLawBlog/~3/gvO6pIRb3qo/what-does-a-smile-mean.html

Mesothelioma Nursing Home Abuse Personal Injury Lawyer Product Liability Serious Injury Sexual Harassment

The Death of RSS and the Rise of Twitter

twitterWhen news broke yesterday that Google was dumping GoogleReader there were two kinds of reactions from bloggers noted Bruce Carton at Legal Blog Watch: Those for whom it was the end of the world and those who shrugged.

Carton was in full panic mode. I was a shrugger. I stopped using my RSS feed about a year or two ago, as it simply died a slow death for me.

And that’s because most anyone that I would have followed on RSS is placing links to their blog posts on Twitter. And Twitter also had the advantage of having (short) comments on those blog posts, which might also give you an idea if something was interesting or contentious. RSS was not just redundant, but inferior. (And, as I noted the other day, it can make you a better writer of legal briefs.)

Between Twitter, RSS, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, Instagram, blog post comments, YouTube, listservs, all manner of open discussion forums and whatever else is incubating now that I don’t know about, participating online can easily be a 24/7 job/hobby/distraction. But I have a real job and a real family, as most of you do, and I have to pick and choose. RSS lost. I also have an account at LinkedIn that I rarely check/use, I stopped using forums years ago, and I haven’t yet figured out what to do with Google+, or had the time to explore it.

I haven’t always been a fan of Twitter, and ripped it right after it came out. But I’ve come to appreciate its utility, an appreciation that comes only by carefully screening those I might follow.

When someone follows me, I generally look at their last three tweets (or “twits” as Scott Greenfield quite appropriately calls them). If those tweets are about a local accident, in the desperate hope the victim will log on to Twitter and find this brilliance, I know this is not a person to follow. So too with anyone in legal marketing. I need more phone calls and emails from these hucksters like I need a hole in the head.

But worse still are those that respond to an individual with something like “Ha!”, apparently forgetting that many others will see this gibberish, not just the one that sent the message being responded to. And even worse are those that write, “Thanks for the RT!” Thanks for sharing your insecurity, with me by noting how important an RT is to you.

Why anyone would want this crap clogging their Twitter feed and rendering it useless is beyond me. Links and short comments on relevant stories are what works.

And you know those folks that are following thousands of others? It’s pretty clear such folks are not reading their own Twitter feeds. I don’t give a damn if they follow me or not.

Last year I spoke at a conference on social media down in Washington DC. And a woman that followed after me was hit by an audience question: If someone follows you on Twitter, are you supposed to follow them back? “Yes!” she cried, as that was the polite thing to do. I almost fell off my chair as I recognized the entire audience had just become dumber for having heard this.

Twitter can be a good tool that certainly replaces RSS. Just be sure to carefully cull the list of those you follow. You can follow me if you want (@Turkewitz) but don’t be upset if I don’t follow back. My brain has a limited capacity.

That’s my two pesos. Bruce Carton’s mileage will vary. And remember that no one will ever put the number of your Twitter follows on your headstone.

Elsewhere on the subject:

Really Simple Sign of the Future (Greenfield)

The End of GoogleReader: A Sign of Blogging’s Decline and Lessons for Lawyers (Elefant)

 

Share

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewYorkPersonalInjuryLawBlog/~3/v1Te5HI7dMQ/the-death-of-rss-and-the-rise-of-twitter.html

Work Injury Lawyer Workers Compensation Wrongful Death Accident Lawyer Amputation Injury Asbestos Lawyer

Subaru Recalls Vehicles Due to Moonroof Detachment

My goodness, is this the first step toward a James Bond ejection seat? Apparently Subaru has figured out how to make the moonroof fly off suddenly. I wonder if they’re working now on the ejection mechanism?

Cars reports, “Subaru is recalling just 14 model-year 2012 Outback wagons and Legacy sedans due to a problem with the moonroof glass that could cause it to detach, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.” Cars notes that “an inadequate amount and position of adhesive between the glass and retainer of the moonroof could cause the glass to loosen and detach while driving, creating a potential road hazard and increasing the risk of a crash, according to NHTSA. Subaru has already notified affected owners, and dealers will inspect the condition of the glass adhesion and either apply additional adhesive or replace the moonroof glass for free, according to NHTSA.”

From the American Association for Justice news release.

Source: http://www.pissd.com/2013/03/subaru-recalls-vehicles-due-to-moonroof-detachment/

Brain Injuries Burn Injuries Catastrophic Injuries Construction Accidents Defective Drugs Defective Product

Wednesday, 1 May 2013

Traumatic Brain Injuries, Part 2: Various Types of Brain Injuries

In part 2 of the Traumatic Brain Injury series, California brain injury attorney Eric Ratinoff outlines the different types of brain injuries, including penetrating brain injuries, contusion, hematoma, concussion, anoxia & hypoxia, coup contrecoup injuries, and diffuse axonal injuries.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheKCRLegalPersonalInjuryPodcast/~3/s9N3v8g1nmQ/10_12-15_EJRbraininjurypodcast-part2.mp3

Workers Compensation Wrongful Death Accident Lawyer Amputation Injury Asbestos Lawyer Back Injuries

Subaru Recalls Vehicles Due to Moonroof Detachment

My goodness, is this the first step toward a James Bond ejection seat? Apparently Subaru has figured out how to make the moonroof fly off suddenly. I wonder if they’re working now on the ejection mechanism?

Cars reports, “Subaru is recalling just 14 model-year 2012 Outback wagons and Legacy sedans due to a problem with the moonroof glass that could cause it to detach, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.” Cars notes that “an inadequate amount and position of adhesive between the glass and retainer of the moonroof could cause the glass to loosen and detach while driving, creating a potential road hazard and increasing the risk of a crash, according to NHTSA. Subaru has already notified affected owners, and dealers will inspect the condition of the glass adhesion and either apply additional adhesive or replace the moonroof glass for free, according to NHTSA.”

From the American Association for Justice news release.

Source: http://www.pissd.com/2013/03/subaru-recalls-vehicles-due-to-moonroof-detachment/

Toxic Tort Attorney Work Injury Lawyer Workers Compensation Wrongful Death Accident Lawyer Amputation Injury

Sen. Rob Portman, Gay Rights, and Tort “Reform”

RobPortmanLast week Ohio Senator Rob Portman made headlines when he reversed his stance on gay marriage. For a Republican, that was pretty big news. He did it after finding out his son was gay and reflecting on the meaning of love, marriage and religion.

But that isn’t why I’m writing.

I’m writing because, in his explanation, he went beyond the love/marriage/religion elements to reflect on the proper role of government in society. He wrote:

British Prime Minister David Cameron has said he supports allowing gay couples to marry because he is a conservative, not in spite of it. I feel the same way. We conservatives believe in personal liberty and minimal government interference in people’s lives.

So if he, as a conservative, believes in minimal government interference in people’s lives, why does he campaign on giving big government protections and immunities with various tort “reform” proposals that close the courthouse doors to those seeking justice?

One of the first things he did as a freshman senator in 2011 was introduce legislation that would impose a new statute of limitations on medical liability lawsuits and cap punitive and noneconomic damages.

His political view is summarized here:

Medical malpractice costs and the mounting costs of defensive medicine must be reduced through sensible legal reform and better health information.
Source: www.robportman.com/1on-the-issues (11/22/2010)

Really Senator? Is that what limited government is all about? Interceding on the rights of people seeking justice by protecting big business and insurance companies?

If someone would be kind enough to forward this to Portman, he might also learn that the artificial caps he supports because of “defensive medicine” have been proven by empirical evidence to be a complete bust. Health care costs in Texas, which instituted artificial one-size-fits-all caps in 2003 didn’t go down. Costs have actually gone up.

So Portman gets a special twofer: His tort “reform” policy contradicts his stance on federal power, and the basis of his policy is factually wrong.

If Portman wants to reign in federal power, as he states in part of his argument favoring gay rights, he may wish to revisit his other positions that call for increasing that power. Especially when increasing it fails to support  his theories.

More on the hypocrisy between conservatism and tort reform  here: Does the Tea Party Believe in Conservatism or Tort “Reform”? (8 Questions)

 

Share

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewYorkPersonalInjuryLawBlog/~3/B27j0MOZ1Jc/sen-rob-portman-gay-rights-and-tort-reform.html

Bicycle Accident Birth Injury Boat Accidents Brain Injuries Burn Injuries Catastrophic Injuries

Driver of SUV barrels into gas station attendant

The plaintiff was struck by the defendant’s SUV while working as a gas station attendant for a food club store. The defendant drove into the gas station and entered a lane to wait for an open pump. The plaintiff walked in front of the defendant’s vehicle and stood approximately one car length away, in plain [...]

Source: http://masslawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/driver-of-suv-barrels-into-gas-station-attendant/

Dog Bites / Dog Attack Elder Abuse Fatal Accidents Head Injuries Medical Malpractice Mesothelioma

Driver of SUV barrels into gas station attendant

The plaintiff was struck by the defendant’s SUV while working as a gas station attendant for a food club store. The defendant drove into the gas station and entered a lane to wait for an open pump. The plaintiff walked in front of the defendant’s vehicle and stood approximately one car length away, in plain [...]

Source: http://masslawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/driver-of-suv-barrels-into-gas-station-attendant/

Spinal Cord Injury Toxic Tort Attorney Work Injury Lawyer Workers Compensation Wrongful Death Accident Lawyer

Food-drive volunteer pinned to wall by lurching vehicle

A 24-year-old-woman was volunteering at a food drive when she was struck by the defendant’s rental car. The defendant allegedly had intended to apply the brake and stop as directed by a volunteer. Instead, he accidentally pressed the accelerator, causing the vehicle to back into the plaintiff and pin her against a concrete wall. The [...]

Source: http://masslawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/food-drive-volunteer-pinned-to-wall-by-lurching-vehicle/

Accident Lawyer Amputation Injury Asbestos Lawyer Back Injuries Bicycle Accident Birth Injury

MSNBC Video: Maybe Propecia Side Effects Don’t Ever Go Away

Not good news for the men who allege they've been affected by Propecia side effects including sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction and even infertility. Check out the msnbc video below—and if you're considering legal help yourself after taking the hair loss drug, you can fill out a Propecia complaint form here.

Source: http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/msnbc-video-maybe-propecia-side-effects-dont-ever-go-away-010440.html

Boat Accidents Brain Injuries Burn Injuries Catastrophic Injuries Construction Accidents Defective Drugs

Traumatic Brain Injuries, Part 8: Diagnostic Tests for Vestibular Dysfunction

In part 8 of the Traumatic Brain Injury series, California brain injury attorney Eric Ratinoff outlines the diagnostic tests used to diagnose vestibular dysfunction.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheKCRLegalPersonalInjuryPodcast/~3/cVJdG0CY5nE/11_1-26_EJRBrainInjuryPodcast-part8.mp3

Bicycle Accident Birth Injury Boat Accidents Brain Injuries Burn Injuries Catastrophic Injuries